Overturn the Walgreens Decision

Walgreens Court Decision Causing Significant Tax Shift

The Issue:  Walgreens and CVS stores rely on a 2008 Wisconsin Supreme Court decision, Walgreens v. City of Madison, to successfully argue that the assessed value of their properties for property tax purposes should be less than half of the actual sale prices of such properties on the open market. Walgreens and CVS have won dramatic assessment reductions across the state since 2008 by arguing that the rent they pay for their newly-constructed, highly-visible corner locations doesn’t accurately reflect its fair market value for property tax purposes. Also since 2008, drugstores have become the most popular single-tenant properties in the national real estate investment market. Walgreens in the Milwaukee metro area, for example, are selling for $5 million or more. But attorneys for Walgreens and CVS, relying on Walgreens v. Madison, argue that their actual sale prices don’t represent market value and the underlying leases are the wrong tool for determining the property’s value for ‘property tax purposes.’ Instead, they say, the assessments should hinge on the amount the landlord could get if the drugstore moved out and a different retailer moved in. The courts have agreed and as a result, these stores are regularly assessed at half or less than their sale prices. Other taxpayers must pay more taxes to make up for the artificially low taxes these stores are paying.

Oshkosh Example: Walgreens challenged the City of Oshkosh’s assessments of two of its stores.  The city based its assessment on the actual amounts for which the properties were sold. The court rejected the city’s approach and ordered that the two Walgreens be refunded for several tax years. The total amount of the refunds equaled $305,672. Other taxpayers in Oshkosh now have to pick up Walgreen’s former share of the tax burden. There are over 200 Walgreens located in Wisconsin’s cities and villages.

Appleton Example:  CVS challenged the City of Appleton’s assessment of its store. Relying on Walgreens v. City of Madison, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals recently affirmed that the value of the CVS property in 2013 was $1.8 million, much less than the City’s $4.4 million assessment based on an actual sale of the property in 2009.  Other taxpayers in Appleton now have to pick up the difference.

Solution:  Pass legislation overturning the 2008 Walgreens v. Madison decision and stop the tax shift to home owners that is occurring. Pass legislation clarifying that actual lease amounts are appropriately factored into the valuation of leased properties.
  1. Walgreens loses tax lawsuit that could have cost Kentucky schools millions

    The Kentucky Supreme Court declined this month to hear an appeal brought by Walgreens Co., presumably ending a longstanding legal battle between the pharmacy chain and Fayette County officials that threatened to strip hundreds of millions of dollars . . . Valarie Honeycutt Spears Lexington Herald Leader
  2. Waukesha_WI

    Target, Menards, Farm & Fleet in battle with city

    WAUKESHA — Some bigbox stores in the city are furthering the monetary burden on taxpayers. The Freeman 04/04/2017 - Page A04
  3. 275px-WI_Ozaukee

    Let there be light

    OZAUKEE COUNTY — The state Legislature is expected to come forward soon to close a tax loophole that big box stores have been using to slash their tax bills. By Melanie Boyung - News Graphic Staff
  4. Big box stores gird for battle with Wisconsin cities

    A battle pitting big-box retail giants including Menards and Wal-Mart against Wisconsin towns and cities is headed to the Legislature. Republican-backed proposals, written in conjunction with the League of Wisconsin Municipalities, are designed to. . . By SCOTT BAUER, Associated Press
View All